What makes github fast

Your manifest file contains information about all packages and dependencies in your project and their versions. The best practice is to specify a version or version range for every package and dependency listed in the manifest. Even when everyone on your team are using the same packages, reusing code and tests across different projects can still be difficult if the packages are of different versions.

If you have a package that is used in multiple projects, try at a minimum to use the same major version of the package. MD within your repository users must have write access to therepository to make changes to MarkDownfiles.

Tasks lists provide an excellent way tocapture a high-level overview of a task or issue, as well as keep othersupdated on its state. Make sure to take advantage of this powerful new feature! Adopting a consistent branch naming convention is essential to keeping your repository organized as your team grows in size.

An efficient naming convention will allow you to keep merge conflicts at a minimum while ensuring your developers are as productive as possible. While there are many branch naming conventions, one of the most popular ones is known as git flow :. Lots of commits went by and some conflicted with your changes Be sure to remove contributors from your organization that are no longer contributing to your codebase. If you remove somebody from your organization for any reason, revoke their GitHub access immediately as well.

Security alerts are another feature new to GitHub. You can read about them here , but the gist is that GitHub now tracks reported security vulnerabilities in some dependencies and will even suggest fixes for you. Developers spend a lot of time working with git and GitHub, so investing in improving your GitHub practices makes a lot of sense.

Implementing best practices in this guide could help the team improve developer productivity and reduce security risks. Ensuring consistent adoption of best practices could be very challenging, especially in fast-growing or large teams. By solving a difficult technical problem—forking code branches and the associated permissions issues—GitHub had also solved the equally difficult yet frustratingly ambiguous human problem of how to effectively collaborate with other programmers.

The social aspect of GitHub was also a powerful driver of growth. Before GitHub, programmers had few ways to prove their programming chops, beyond answering whiteboard hypotheticals in technical interviews. Recruiters could browse public repositories and user profiles to identify prospective hires and see what kind of projects applicants had been working on, making GitHub a valuable recruitment tool. On June 29, , GitHub introduces its Organizations feature , a tool that allows corporate users to manage group-owned repositories from a single, centralized dashboard.

By , it was clear to the founders that the single most important vector of revenue growth would be adoption of GitHub at the enterprise and organizational level. GitHub continued to attract users at an incredible pace. Source: Github.

Amazingly, GitHub had managed to scale rapidly without taking a penny of outside investment. That would change in , when GitHub finally welcomed its first investor, Andreessen Horowitz. By , GitHub had become incredibly popular. Not only had GitHub steadily attracted a strong user base with virtually no advertising, promotion, or venture capital funding, but it had also grown the number of corporate teams using GitHub to host private repositories of proprietary code. What GitHub needed to do now was scale revenue by penetrating further into the enterprise.

Individuals by themselves, small teams, students, as well as big, massive enterprises. By the time GitHub raised its Series A, it had more than 1. Accepting one of the largest Series A rounds in history gave GitHub much more freedom, but it also placed even more pressure on a company already wrestling with the duality of its identity. By , GitHub had grown impressively. The company had created a solid product that solved urgent problems and had built an entire company around an emerging technology.

To maintain the impressive momentum the company had established and realize its bolder ambitions, it needed capital. GitHub would use this funding to hire additional engineering talent and develop new products. This was not the case. By the time GitHub began looking for external investment, the product was already clearly defined with a large user base.

Best of all, GitHub had been profitable practically since Day 1. This freedom allowed GitHub to intentionally shape not only its product but also the culture of the entire organization, completely free of investor influence. Too much outside influence can be dangerous. Having already achieved significant growth and amassing a legion of loyal programmer evangelists, GitHub wanted to expand its reach—and its potential revenues. So why bother?

Because we want to be better. We want to build the best products. We want to solve harder problems. We want to make life easier for more people. The experience and resources of Andreessen Horowitz can help us do that. This is one of the most fundamental misunderstandings that many people have about GitHub as a company and as a product. In many cases, GitHub had solved big, ambitious problems with programming itself. What was particularly brilliant about GitHub was that it did so by creating a product that solved those problems that also created a vast potential market for that product.

Wanstrath and his friends could have focused on smaller, specific technical problems. Instead, they went after problems that were so big and so fundamentally inherent to programming at that time that solving them created a vast potential market for their product. This appeal reached far beyond open-source hobbyists and script kids hacking in their bedrooms.

It was also powerfully attractive to large corporate interests. Some firms, such as Mozilla, had several hundred repos and hosted virtually everything on GitHub. By the end of , GitHub had 2. It was the first time that federal legislative policy had been shared in such a manner. Hosting governmental policy documents externally on the servers of a private company was unheard of, as was the notion of allowing the public to fork and merge policy documents.

The announcement was incredible free PR for GitHub, and it also hinted at other potential use cases for GitHub that open-data advocates and tech-savvy policy wonks had been talking about for years—even if those use cases would ultimately never materialize.

By , GitHub was version control for many programmers. But it was far more than just that: It was a social hub where coders could learn from one another. It was a programmer portfolio site, social network, and professional networking hub. Of course, the bigger you are, the bigger a target you become.

On March 28, , GitHub endured the largest cyberattack it had experienced since launch. The attack—a standard distributed denial of service attack, or DDoS—was believed to have originated in China. But the attack was not an attempt to cripple an American company for the benefit of an Asian competitor. Instead, the attack was allegedly aimed at just two GitHub projects.

Speaking about the funding, Chris Wanstrath told reporters the company planned to use its Series B funding to make significant investments, develop new products, and—most significantly— expand internationally. GitHub continued to expand. By July , GitHub had more than 9M users and was hosting over 21M repositories, officially making GitHub the largest code repository in the world.

However, although GitHub was still growing—at a rate of 10, new users per workday by September —the pace of that growth was slowing. GitHub was facing heightened competition from both Bitbucket and GitLab, and user growth suffered as a result. Revenue, on the other hand, was increasing rapidly. Revenues from GitHub Enterprise had tripled. There was talk of an IPO, rumors of unlikely acquisitions, and conspiracy theories about even less likely mergers.

Source: Microsoft. Many people pledged to leave GitHub in protest. Some users posted that they were already in the process of migrating their repositories from GitHub to competing services GitLab or Bitbucket. Stories about GitHub. Some developers are furious Some developers are frustrated over the way the time-saving tool for coders was built. Others are excited about its potential.

News How many people have voted so far in ? This live map and state database will tell you Democrats are voting early in much higher numbers than Republicans. News Tech workers organize protest against Palantir on the GitHub coding platform The protest action is designed to target employees where they live. Tech Software engineers live in Jira. Can Atlassian help them love it?